Please Read This First

Hi! I’m Brother Scott and before you read any of my posts, I ask that you read this first. It’s meant to enlighten you into my mindset, so that if I’m fortunate enough to find readers, there may be some understanding into the workings of my noggin.


I’m 61, with no formal education (Too many drugs in my youth) and I question everything, to the delight of some and the consternation of others. To use a popular buzzword in the modern-day Christian vernacular, I de-constructed. For those who are not familiar with that term, here is a short definition. “A critical re-appraisal of one's faith tradition” in my case Western Evangelicalism, which sprung out of The Great Awakening that happened between the 1720s and 1740s in colonial America. Readers should know that I am eternally grateful for this movement. I believe it's because of Western Evangelicalism that the missionary push to spread the gospel came to its zenith. However, that being said, after examining many of the beliefs that I had embraced since and comparing them to other forms of Christian orthodoxy...I have questions. Questions that should be asked, whether or not there are answers, is another thing entirely.


Unlike many who deconstruct then de-converted from the Christian faith, I didn’t. It actually solidified my beliefs, allowed me to put things in a proper perspective and take an unfettered look at church dogma through the lens of the early church. This is when I investigated other more ancient forms of Christianity and though I did find a lot of commonality, I also found many deviations in thought and doctrines


Cognitive dissonance is quite common when confronted with some unpleasant truths about one’s beliefs. It's something that I've experienced and I can tell you it's a bit unnerving. To give it a brief definition would be the following “Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes”. In other words, some of my writings may vex you, they may go against what you have been taught, and you may not like it. I understand but I won't apologize. Sometimes uncomfortable truths are necessary for the overall spiritual health of the believer. I want to see you healthy.


But please don't think that my musings will only be about doctrinal issues There are plenty of other issues I'm concerned with, and I'll elaborate on them more fully in a future time.


So in closing, I'm in no way "liberal" theologically. I fully believe in the Deity, Death and Resurrection of Jesus. He is both Fully God and Fully man. I can’t explain in detail how that’s possible, but after all he is God. So I'll just leave it at that.



Happy Reading!


Bro. Scott

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biblical Inerrancy vs Moral Infallibility Part 2

While related, the concepts of biblical moral infallibility and biblical inerrancy differ in their scope and focus when viewed through the lens of the cross. Here's a breakdown: Biblical Inerrancy: Focus: Claims that the Bible is completely free from factual errors, including historical, scientific, and moral claims. This implies that everything in the Bible is literally true and divinely inspired. Challenges: This view faces challenges from historical and scientific discrepancies in the Bible, as well as passages that seem to contradict each other or condone morally questionable actions. Relationship to the Cross: The cross, as a symbol of God's radical love and forgiveness, doesn't directly address inerrancy. However, some argue that the cross's message of grace transcends literal interpretations and emphasizes the core message of love and redemption. Biblical Infallibility: Focus: Claims that the Bible's moral teachings are always true and reliable, even if the t...
Read more

Taking a Nuanced Approach to Inerrantcy Part 4

Taking a nuanced approach to biblical Innerantcy involves acknowledging its complexity, and engaging with it in a way that goes beyond simplistic interpretations. Here are some key aspects of a nuanced approach: Understanding context and historical background: Recognizing that the Bible was written over a long period by diverse authors with different agendas and audiences. Looking at things strictly through the lens of the twenty-first century can lead to misunderstandings. Considering the historical, social, and cultural contexts in which the texts were written. Imposing our current cultural norms over the backdrop of biblical times gives an unfair bias against biblical historicity. Understanding the literary genres used in different parts of the Bible (e.g., poetry, history, prophecy, law) and how they shape meaning. Recognizing diverse interpretations: Acknowledging that there are multiple ways to interpret biblical texts, both within and across different Christian traditions. Engag...
Read more

Words Matter, Definitions Matter

I am going to make a statement, words matter, definitions matter. It’s my opinion that words and definitions hold immense significance in the lexicon of Christian understanding and we should be meticulous in our understanding of them. The Bible, the foundational text of Christianity, the inspired word of God, it depends on the precise meaning of its words. Making it crucial for understanding God's character, nature, and plan for humanity. Throughout history, such theologians as Ignatius, Polycarp, Origen, Clement of Alexandria, and many others have meticulously examined and debated the meaning of specific terms and concepts found in the scriptures, as these words shape one's perception of God and faith. For instance, the definition of "love" in Christianity is not merely an emotional sentiment but encompasses a profound commitment to the well-being of others, as exemplified by God's sacrificial love for humanity. Similarly, the concept of "salvation" in ...
Read more